|
Post by lolita88 on Jun 23, 2008 23:00:28 GMT -5
I've seen Bob in Kate doc's and from what i heard he was a very nice and pretty decent human being. Why publicly berate him for being courteous?
Let's just wait and see what she has to say in the future. Of course she won't say anything mean in the lecture, does she want a stampede of Kate fans charging at her? lol
|
|
|
Post by dreamer on Jun 24, 2008 0:59:35 GMT -5
I don't think you have to take the article word by word as it is printed. First of all I think you should give Katharine Houghton the benefit of the doubt. Journalists tend to twist words as they please. Non of us knows if this were her words - exactly as she said them. I hate to point this out - but where did you read this article and what are the writers that are mentioned. They might know each other Try google the names... Am guessing that the main point by this article was to say that certain writers are wrong and that Kate and Spencer were heterosexual. What I read was that a woman in love lost her love - she was under enormous stress during his last days. Just remember how we feel when we know that a loved one has to part from us - and we are not in the limelight. I for one am not my self - insecure, feeling alone; almost already left behind - in other words fragile and yet strong in a way that is almost impossible to explain. Like the care we provide - we are not really there but only focused on the other. So if you think about it that way - Kate was unhappy - had no influence of what happened to Spencer. She lost him and knew she would. After his death she had to find her self in order to keep a going - otherwise she wouldn't have stopped grieving. She had to find a way for her as the one left. To make a big deal about it is no need - but it makes a point. SHE LOVED HIM. And that is what is important and should be remembered. As most women - she changed - for him - to please him. Even strong women do when they are in love. The big problem is when you are back on your own again. You have to re-find your self as Kate had to do. Not an easy task. But I think she did a damn fine job in doing so. Losing friends or not - which I don't believe is the truth. Naa we know that this can't be true - just remember the ones we know of. There may have been one or two during the years - so what. Haven't you lost a friend at some point or you just lost them - sort of out of sight?
|
|
|
Post by HollywoodHepcat on Jun 24, 2008 4:16:57 GMT -5
Alyssa babygurl, listen up. I adore Katharine Houghton Grant like whoa. Think of what you're saying! Poor Kathy has yet to strip away from the label of being "Katharine Hepburn's neice" in theatre reviews. She can't stand on her own two feet without that darn title following her around like a cartoon storm cloud. She's not riding Kate's coat tails, she's snagged on them. O0oo0ohhhh metaphors!
My thoughts? It doesn't run in the Hepburn genes to be an ungrateful, conniving asshat. We can give that title of the year and every year to one Miss Christina Crawford. [Every once and a while she can loan it out to B.D.] Or as I call her: PenisNose. To even put those two women in the same sentence makes me want to throw up all over the 4 copies of Mommie Dearest I own and then roll in it. What a visual.
Kathy Houghton: Adorable Bucket of Win.
Christina Crawford: Faux-Albino Fish-Faced Beady-Eyed Wooden Statue of No Talent And Poo.
I agree with Kathy on about 95% of what she's saying. She might have worded Kate's circumstances post-Spencer a bit on the bereft and abandoned side, but there is some truth in what she says. What cause would she have to lie about it? Yes, Kate did have an outsized personality. Yes, she was spoilt. Yes, she got on her friends nerves sometimes and fights happened yadda yadda. Whatever, she was merely saying that Spence was the Ying to Kate's Yang. Or vice verca. Uhm, ::giggles::
Dude, I didn't think Kathy's integrity would be in question here.
[Hide the chillun' from this post. language!]
|
|
|
Post by Hep on Jun 24, 2008 10:05:08 GMT -5
OH MA GAHHH ! what happened to me ! i cant believe i actually questioned my loved for Houghts ! yah know what.. its been a loooooong week. Bio regents (which i just got back from); family issues.. all that nonsense. ive been out of it lately. now i sorta see what Kathy was tryna say here.. and yea Dreamer your right maybe the author twisted her words around. it did seem really odd that she would go against Kath like that but maybe Kathy was just getting a tad fed up with the whole "Hepburns neice title" thing so maybe she vented a tiny little bit. *slaps hands; takes a deep breath*
ok. im better now. sorry Kathy.
|
|
|
Post by lolita88 on Jun 25, 2008 19:19:27 GMT -5
Amber I think you're right in what you're saying. But I still think it sucks if Kathy did say some of those things so lets hope the words have been manipulated by journos. I guess I'm so shocked by it because it isn't her usual tone in interviews.
|
|
|
Post by babytheleopard on Jun 26, 2008 9:54:17 GMT -5
Amber I think you're right in what you're saying. But I still think it sucks if Kathy did say some of those things so lets hope the words have been manipulated by journos. I guess I'm so shocked by it because it isn't her usual tone in interviews. I have a feeling the journalists may have twisted her words around...it just doesn't sound like her. But who knows...let's hope it's that way.
|
|
|
Post by babytheleopard on Jun 26, 2008 20:18:07 GMT -5
So after re-reading this article...it makes me question the credibility of it. It seems like the article has no clear substance. And I really wonder if the journalist took her words completely out of context. I really wasn't happy about what was said, especially when she says "She really wasted the last 20 years of her life." Would Kathy really say that??
I don't know...this raises a lot of questions...
|
|
|
Post by Hep on Jun 29, 2008 14:44:12 GMT -5
im stilled confu-zzzzzled about this. we gotta get Kathy to join this board; she'd clear things up.
|
|
|
Post by lolita88 on Jun 29, 2008 16:57:47 GMT -5
yeah let's try and locate her and make her join lol..
|
|
|
Post by Hep on Jun 29, 2008 17:18:43 GMT -5
no lie im ready to start researching lmao.. just kidddding. not that big of a stalker. when i met her i was gonna tell her about the forum but i forgot everything by time she said hi to me lol.
|
|
|
Post by lolita88 on Jun 29, 2008 17:30:52 GMT -5
lol did anyone get pix taken with her?
|
|
|
Post by Hep on Jun 29, 2008 17:45:37 GMT -5
dont remind me how stupid i was to forget.
|
|
|
Post by lolita88 on Jun 29, 2008 18:53:02 GMT -5
I feel bad for you lol. I met Maureen O'Hara when I was 16 in Macy's and I forgot to get a pic taken with her, although she wasn't very approachable so I think it was more of a fear rather than forgetting!
|
|
|
Post by HollywoodHepcat on Jun 29, 2008 18:57:42 GMT -5
I think I just burst something.
|
|
|
Post by lolita88 on Jun 29, 2008 19:22:06 GMT -5
howcome Amber?
|
|