|
Post by rosie on Nov 4, 2009 23:41:04 GMT -5
Well good for you Judy. I just meant I am not buying into this discussion any more. I wasn't offended I just can't be bothered. ;D
|
|
|
Post by dreamer on Nov 5, 2009 15:32:52 GMT -5
Well good for you Judy. I just meant I am not buying into this discussion any more. I wasn't offended I just can't be bothered. ;D Excuse me - " can't be bothered" - what kind of answer is that!!! It is rude and uncalled for. Rosie - we have until now been a board where we accept the varieties of one another. We talk and discuss - we agree to disagree - but to just dismiss the opinion of others is not acceptable - nor the nicest way to be. So I would ask you as an Admin - if you want to stay on this board - to treat other members with respect and NOT indifference. Should you not be able to do so - this board will then have to "invite" you to sit this out.
|
|
|
Post by Judy on Nov 7, 2009 22:35:45 GMT -5
Well good for you Judy. I just meant I am not buying into this discussion any more. I wasn't offended I just can't be bothered. ;D Excuse me - " can't be bothered" - what kind of answer is that!!! It is rude and uncalled for. Rosie - we have until now been a board where we accept the varieties of one another. We talk and discuss - we agree to disagree - but to just dismiss the opinion of others is not acceptable - nor the nicest way to be. So I would ask you as an Admin - if you want to stay on this board - to treat other members with respect and NOT indifference. Should you not be able to do so - this board will then have to "invite" you to sit this out. Well, yes, there was a barely veiled implication that I was being dusted off like dirt on her shoe because I chose to offer an opposing view. No amount of smiley faces can disguise that. No matter. For anyone wishing to form an opinion based on information rather than ignorance, here's a link you can check out. I think it takes you to page 180 or 181 of the book - but if you page back, a good place to start reading - for anyone who is interested in a little background - would be page 177: books.google.com/books?id=2eh_3q5wqj0C&pg=PA181&lpg=PA181&dq=ameri#v=onepage&q=ameri&f=false
|
|
|
Post by HollywoodHepcat on Nov 7, 2009 22:54:08 GMT -5
Ouch, son, I think you just got served.
|
|
|
Post by Shaun on Nov 7, 2009 23:16:07 GMT -5
I wish I could see what all this kerfuffle is about. My computer won't load the damn video.
|
|
|
Post by HollywoodHepcat on Nov 8, 2009 0:48:36 GMT -5
Which video, Shaun? The Producer's Lie-berry version of "American Creed" or the DRAMATIC!Gopher youtube link? The former, right? Katie's computer was actin' all batshit as far as that video goes, too, only playing the audio. I had to tell her what was happening onscreen while everybody delivered their lines. I mean, that's practically the same thing. For instance:
"Dude, Jennifer Jones is looking at the camera like she wants to eat it for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Oh, and now Kate's whipping her head around to us, the audience, and she's wearing that stupidASS buckled-blazer---WHY do you need a buckle ON YOUR SHOULDER? Like, is she afraid that her sleeve is going to fall off?----and there's this little figurine of a leopard to her right, which I think is a homage to Baby. Or it could just be a figurine of a leopard, but we're going to pretend."
See? Exactly like watching it yourself.
|
|
|
Post by HollywoodHepcat on Nov 8, 2009 0:51:27 GMT -5
And in other news, you just said the word "kerfuffle". We are meant to be, Shaun DubYuh.
|
|
|
Post by Shaun on Nov 8, 2009 21:37:30 GMT -5
Well did you ever find the perfect china pattern??
|
|
|
Post by HollywoodHepcat on Nov 9, 2009 0:07:19 GMT -5
Hmm. Ya know, I've discovered something about myself throughout this entire rigamarole. While I am presumptuous enough to propose holy matrimony on the Internet, I haven't a shred of design sense. None whatsoever. [Or maybe I don't particularly care for china? Plausible.] I say we cut our losses and base our entire design aesthetic on Mad Men. I promise to saunter around the house in tight-fitting office-chic minidresses purchased from ModCloth.com [Psst: www.modcloth.com/store/ModCloth/Womens/Dresses/Solid/Dark+Passage+Dress], all the while applying and re-applying my lipstick ad nauseam. PS, This newfound living situation gives you full leeway to transform yourself into a quasi-Don Draper, in that you may: remain absolutely silent when in doubt; give vague, open-ended answers when asked about your past; have a great name; look fantastic in a suit; look fantastic in casual wear; look fantastic in anything; sound good; smell good; strut around with supreme confidence; be uncannily good at your job; blow people away every time you say anything; take six-hour lunches; lie to everyone about everything; drink and smoke constantly. However, DON'T DRAPER OUR HOME LIFE YO. I WILL DIVORCE YOU AND MARRY (?) A SUAVE ATTORNEY. WHAT IS THIS THREAD, EVEN?!!!!?
|
|
|
Post by Shaun on Nov 10, 2009 0:19:50 GMT -5
I'm sure I don't know! Folks gettin all huffy, talking about socialism and stuff. Meanwhile we're just trying to goof on Kate in between making wedding arrangements. I nominate it for thread of the year!
|
|
|
Post by Shaun on Nov 10, 2009 0:22:57 GMT -5
And I'm sure this thread will sweep its category. The forum has been dead all year long.
|
|
|
Post by HollywoodHepcat on Nov 10, 2009 13:43:29 GMT -5
A talk about socialism, peppered with mentions of Katharine Hepburn's hilarious awk-ness and matrimony sounds like every conversation I've ever had, actually. WHO THE HELL AM I. (Other than the most unnecessary human you know.)
Pshaw, the forum hasn't really been dead all year---we've just ignored Kate for a while which I think is a healthy way to be, truthfully.
AND "THREAD OF THE YEAR" YESSSSS. The prize is this C paper I'm turning in today. FML.
|
|
|
Post by dreamer on Dec 11, 2009 13:27:41 GMT -5
Ouch, son, I think you just got served. Nope - she chose to leave
|
|